Somehow I ended up at a site that seems as positive towards Windows as most of the Mac and Linux sites I frequent. And then I found several articles talking about the future of Windows, which is Code Named "Whistler", and which will probably be called Windows.NET when it ships (Wonder how much Microsoft paid for Windows.NET when they realized they wanted it?). The are articles that start with the earliest glimmers of Whistler, things in between, and now on Windows Whistler Beta 1.
For better or for worse, there actually a lot of new interface ideas being thrown around in that soup, and it'll be interesting to see what ultimately emerges. Based on what I'm seeing, however, I do think that it will almost entirely be an improvement on what Windows is right now, even if the interface still has other fundamental flaws which Whistler isn't even going to come close to addressing.
All the same, I find myself being in the unique position of actually being curious about a Microsoft Operating System. Never before now have I wondered what will come of a system, but I'm almost looking forward to finding out how well Whistler will smash all these ideas together.
Between all the new ideas and simplification in Whistler, and all the new ideas and simplification in Mac OS X, it really looks like the next generation of Operating System wars is going to be very interesting. Both systems should be on equal footing as far as stability goes, even if OS X offers more things for the unix geek in me to do. Whistler has the Windows installed base going for it, while I'd say OS X has maybe a little more eye candy going for it.
The final thing I'd like to comment on is the task based interface paradigm which Microsoft seems to be embracing completely. I haven't thought about it much before now, but off the top of my head, it seems like the "What do you want to do today" interface should be very easy for beginners to comprehend and master. It should make it very clear what there is to do with the computer, which is a big problem I've seen people have. When I was an RCC, I couldn't count how many people asked me "So what do I do with the Internet now that I have it?" The "{What|Where} do you want to {do|go} today" interface paradigm seems to exactly address that issue, and I give props to Microsoft for using it. Now, I want to know where they stole the idea from.
So it looks like OS X versus Whistler is going to be a really fantastic fight to the death, and I don't think Linux has a chance in hell of competing with those two. And that's fine by me, because OS X offers me all the unix I need. It should be clear which side I'm on, even if I'm slightly enticed by the dark side. The battle should be nearly as fierce as the next generation video game console wars that are shaping up for next fall. Between Mac OS X, Game Boy Advance, Nintendo Gamecube, Microsoft Whistler, and Microsoft Xbox, along with the PlayStation 2 and Dreamcast, the second half of next year is going to be quite a spectacular thing to behold. Let's hope that one company doesn't come out on top of all this mess, because that would be a bad thing. On the bright side, the side I'm rooting for (Nintendo and Apple) should beat Microsoft (Xbox and Whistler) to market, giving them a headstart.