After seeing Dungeons and Dragons, I left the theatre thinking that it was pretty safe to say that that Marlon Wayans was the best actor in the whole film. If this doesn't concern you, it should. You probably just haven't seen Scary Movie yet. (And on that side note, don't.) Honestly though, Wayans' character Snails was a bright spot in the movie. Sure, Snails' only purpose is to provide cowardly sidekick comic relief, and he's just another entry into the Jar-Jar category, but at least he appeared genuinely human and funny. Wayans obviously did the best he could with the material he was given.
I wish I could say the same thing about the rest of the acting in the movie, but if I did that, I'm pretty sure that would be a big enough lie all by itself to keep a person out of heaven. First, I'd like to find out when Thora Birch forgot how to act. Perhaps riding high on the success of American Beauty, Birch thinks she can continue to play every role as a sullen high schooler, but frankly I've seen better acting at a High School play. Admittedly, it's not the actresses fault that her character was writtten as an empress with a Queen Amidala complex and some spunky proletarian ideals. But while covering the emotional range from whiny and idealistic to whiny and pouting, Birch's acting efforts don't help. As an empress in a fantasy film, realistic lines are too much to ask for. But for the love of gods, try to deliver flimsy lines better than I can. It really hurt. Most of the other actors weren't much better, and neither was the ridiculous dialogue.
The plot was typical, but I wasn't expecting this to be brilliant, so I wasn't that upset by it. The fact that the hero actually had motivation to do what he was doing was a detail which I liked, even if his obligatory love interest was obvious from moment one. While there were reasons for some of the team to be doing what they were doing, there were a couple of party members who were tacked on apparently as an afterthought. While the dwarf and the elven ranger seemed to become friendly in a cold and sterile chummy sort of way, there was no development of the relationship, nor was there any reason for either character to hang around. It's too a shame that there was no on screen development of the friendship between the dwarf and the elf, because building a friendship between a dwarf and an elf -- two races which have more than a passing dislike of each other in the D&D universe -- would have been interesting character development.
While the dwarf and elf were effectively static characters, the other characters did receive reasonable development. Ridley is the hero of the tale, and is roughly a cross between Luke Skywalker from Star Wars and Neo from The Matrix. He and his partner in crime Snails actually seemed to be honest friends, and Snails was able to give Ridley honest motivation for completing his quest. The wizard was pulled into the party in a reasonable way (I always wondered why a wizard would leave her nice safe library and risk being exploded). And relationships were developed well for a movie based on a game, even if the dialogue was pretty bad.
The costumes were acceptable at best, ridiculous at worst. Aside from the princess pretty visibly ripping off Star Wars, some of Ridley's post-thief clothing, and the elfs breastplate, I didn't have that big of a problem with the attire, which managed to live up to D&D styles pretty well.
The computer animated graphics were good fun, and the dragon fight would have been the best part of the whole movie if they hadn't ruined it by deciding to have the empress try to ride a dragon while looking constipated. There was no reason for it, other than to interrupt exciting dragon scenes with shots of their big name actresses in agony with a stupid gold thing on her head shaking up and down. The computer generated skylines and castles looked great, even if the buildings we saw the actors next to looked nothing like them.
I think a lot of the movie could have been salvaged if they'd gone full CG, like Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within is doing. Then they could have had even more fantastic fights and made the actors as consistently bad as they'd liked without letting Marlon Wayans show up the rest of the cast.
While it failed, on the whole, as a movie, it did manage to live up to the game it was based off of. It had the anachronistic clothing, the bad acting, a couple of uninterested characters who'd rather be doing something else, and a bar fight. Perhaps the only point on which this movie was not a good interpretation of the game was that the hero had a good emotional motivation for his actions.
Despite all of it's bad points, I enjoyed seeing a movie which depicted it's source material reasonably well. Though other movie goers didn't enjoy it for that reason, I think more than a few of them enjoyed laughing at the bad acting and the serious folks in the audience who kept saying "Shh, I'm trying to hear the [really corny] dialogue!" And any D&D basher who sees this movie will leave wondering what they were bashing, unless they consider bad acting a sin, because the movie, much like D&D, was just a fantasy story.
As a movie, I'd give it a 2/5. And I'd like to give the directory of the movie a stern talking to, because this was the wrong project for a first time director, and apparently owning the rights since he was 20 was his only qualification. And the sequel hints at the end made me cringe, for fear I'd have to go through the movie again. But I'd like to thank whoever named the hero Ridley, allowing me to Riddle my Review with Ridicule of this Ridiculous movie. Good Riddance.